By Manny Fernandez

January 22, 2017

Data Breaches – January 2017

Below are the breaches for January 2017 that were made public. If you have accounts with any of there services/companies make sure you change your passwords and ensure you are monitoring your credit for anomalies.

ORGANIZATION: Sanrio
DATE OF BREACH: December 19, 2015
DATE MADE PUBLIC: January 14, 2017
RECORDS AFFECTED: 3,345,168

DATA COMPROMISED:
A Sanrio database was misconfigured and exposed to the public in 2015. This was eventually secured and the company assured concerned parties that it did not believe that any data had been stolen. This month, a database of 3,345,168 users has surfaced online, suggesting that someone did manage to get their hands on the poorly-secured data after all. Compromised information includes names, birthdays, email addresses, passwords and password hint questions, genders, and country.—————————————————————————

ORGANIZATION: Supercell
DATE OF BREACH: September 2016
DATE MADE PUBLIC: January 17, 2017
RECORDS AFFECTED: 1.1 Million

DATA COMPROMISED:
Supercell, the creator of mobile game Clash of Clans, has revealed an attack on its member forums. The Clash of Clans developer said that the issue has been fixed but urges users to change their passwords as soon as possible. Compromised information includes usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and hashed passwords.

—————————————————————————

ORGANIZATION: US Special Operations Command (SOCOM)
DATE OF BREACH: Unknown
DATE MADE PUBLIC: December 31, 2016
RECORDS AFFECTED: 11GB of Data

DATA COMPROMISED:
11GB of data was exposed when US government subcontractor, Potomac, misconfigured a data back-up. It included details of nurses, doctors and mental health support staff as well as unit assignments and postings dating back to 1998.The company has now removed the data and said it was investigating the breach. Compromised information includes names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and salaries of some Socom staff.

—————————————————————————

ORGANIZATION: CoPilot Provider Support Services
DATE OF BREACH: October 2015
DATE MADE PUBLIC: January 18, 2017
RECORDS AFFECTED: 220,000

DATA COMPROMISED:
Hackers gained unauthorized access to one of CoPilot’s databases used by healthcare professionals. The company does not have evidence to suggest that any patient information was distributed or misused for purposes of identity theft or to cause financial harm. CoPilot has proactively notified patients out of an abundance of caution. Compromised information includes patient names, genders, dates of birth, addresses, phone numbers, health insurers, and in some instances Social Security numbers.

Recent posts

  • If you've spent any time configuring user authentication on... Full Story

  • DNS is one of those technologies that quietly underpins... Full Story

  • BGP issues on FortiGate firewalls usually trace back to... Full Story

  • Every time your laptop talks to your router, a... Full Story

  • If you've spent any time configuring NAT on a... Full Story

  • If you have spent any time configuring firewall policies... Full Story

  • High availability on FortiGate is one of those features... Full Story

  • If you've configured SD-WAN on a FortiGate, you've almost... Full Story

  • FortiLink is the management protocol that turns a FortiSwitch... Full Story

  • FortiSwitches are pretty rock solid from Mean Time Between... Full Story

  • This is a quicky tip.  Have you ever gone... Full Story

  • DNS is one of those quiet pieces of internet... Full Story

  • This article is an updated version of the previous... Full Story

  • You will add ns2 as a secondary (slave) BIND9... Full Story

  • In the process of deploying my lab, I needed... Full Story

  • RFC 8805, used to be known as Self-Correcting IP... Full Story

  • Years back, I wrote an article about certificate pinning. ... Full Story

  • FortiGates have the ability to send alerts to Microsoft... Full Story

  • In this post, I am going to walk through... Full Story

  • Troubleshooting VoIP on a FortiGate can feel like trying... Full Story

  • Prior to FortiOS 7.0, there were three commands to... Full Story

  • In this post, I am going to go over... Full Story

  • What we are going to do:  We are going... Full Story

  • Choosing between FGCP (FortiGate Clustering Protocol) and FGSP (FortiGate... Full Story

  • Creating a VLAN on macOS (The "Pro" Move) A... Full Story

  • This blog post explores the logic behind how macOS... Full Story

  • Pretty Fly for a Wi-Fi Tell My Wi-Fi Love... Full Story

  • Part of my daily gig is creating BoMs (Bill-of-Materials)... Full Story

  • ICMP introduces several security risks, but careful filtering, rate... Full Story

  • The command diag debug application dhcps -1 enables full... Full Story

  • In the world of FortiOS, execute tac report is... Full Story

  • LLDP; What is it The Link Layer Discovery Protocol... Full Story

  • What it actually does When you run diagnose fdsm... Full Story

  • Monkey Bites are bite-sized, high-impact security insights designed for... Full Story

  • I have run macOS in macOS with Parallels but... Full Story

  • Don't be confused with my other FortiNAC posts where... Full Story

  • This is the third session in a multi-part article... Full Story

  • Today I was configuring key-based authentication on a FortiGate... Full Story

  • Netcat, often called the "Swiss Army knife" of networking,... Full Story

  • At its core, IEEE 802.1X is a network layer... Full Story

  • In case you did not see the previous FortiNAC... Full Story

  • This is our 5th session where we are going... Full Story

  • Now that we have Wireshark installed and somewhat configured,... Full Story

  • The Philosophy of Packet Analysis Troubleshooting isn't about looking... Full Story

  • Overview FortiOS 8.0 introduces custom tags as a first-class... Full Story

  • These are two distinct mechanisms on FortiOS, and conflating... Full Story

  • Replacement messages are the pages and text blocks that... Full Story