By Manny Fernandez

November 18, 2016

Data Breaches October / November 2016

ORGANIZATION:FriendFinder Networks
DATE OF BREACH:October 2016
DATE MADE PUBLIC:November 14,2016
RECORDS AFFECTED: 412 Million
DATA COMPROMISED:
FriendFinder Networks, the parent company of many adult sites, was reportedly hacked through a local file inclusion exploit which enabled the hackers to access all of the network’s sites. Compromised information includes customer usernames, passwords and email addresses.

ORGANIZATION:GitHub/GeekedIn
DATE OF BREACH:Unknown
DATE MADE PUBLIC:November 17, 2016
RECORDS AFFECTED:8.2 Million
DATA COMPROMISED:
A third party acquired data from GitHub and used it for commercial purposes. Security researcher, Troy Hunt, announced, “This incident is not about any sort of security vulnerability on GitHub’s behalf, rather it relates to a trove of data from their site which was inappropriately scraped and then inadvertently exposed due to a vulnerability in another service.”

ORGANIZATION: DealerBuilt
DATE OF BREACH:Unknown
DATE MADE PUBLIC:November 8, 2016
RECORDS AFFECTED: Unknown, but could be up to 5 million
DATA COMPROMISED:
DealerBuilt sells management systems for car dealerships across the US. 128 car dealerships were backing up to DealerBuilt’s systems without any encryption or security and information for both customers and employees have leaked online. Compromised information includes names, Social Security numbers, addresses, and phone numbers.

ORGANIZATION:Three Mobile
DATE OF BREACH:Unknown
DATE MADE PUBLIC:November 18, 2016
RECORDS AFFECTED:Unknown
DATA COMPROMISED:
Hackers allegedly accessed UK-based Three Mobile’s database using stolen employee credentials. After gaining access, they tricked it into sending high-end upgrade handsets to an address where they could intercept them. Compromised information includes names, phone numbers, email addresses, dates of birth, addresses, marital status, previous addresses, genders, and employment status.

ORGANIZATION:Integrity Transitional Hospital
DATE OF BREACH:August 15, 2016
DATE MADE PUBLIC:November 4, 2016
RECORDS AFFECTED: 29,514
DATA COMPROMISED:
An unauthorized individual may have accessed some of the lab results, lab testing information, health insurance information, and scanned driver’s licenses associated with the laboratory’s services. Compromised information includes results of lab tests, health insurance data, and driver’s license numbers.

TOTAL BREACHES IN 2016: 873
TOTAL RECORDS EXPOSED: 29,865,748

Recent posts

  • If you've spent any time configuring user authentication on... Full Story

  • DNS is one of those technologies that quietly underpins... Full Story

  • BGP issues on FortiGate firewalls usually trace back to... Full Story

  • Every time your laptop talks to your router, a... Full Story

  • If you've spent any time configuring NAT on a... Full Story

  • If you have spent any time configuring firewall policies... Full Story

  • High availability on FortiGate is one of those features... Full Story

  • If you've configured SD-WAN on a FortiGate, you've almost... Full Story

  • FortiLink is the management protocol that turns a FortiSwitch... Full Story

  • FortiSwitches are pretty rock solid from Mean Time Between... Full Story

  • This is a quicky tip.  Have you ever gone... Full Story

  • DNS is one of those quiet pieces of internet... Full Story

  • This article is an updated version of the previous... Full Story

  • You will add ns2 as a secondary (slave) BIND9... Full Story

  • In the process of deploying my lab, I needed... Full Story

  • RFC 8805, used to be known as Self-Correcting IP... Full Story

  • Years back, I wrote an article about certificate pinning. ... Full Story

  • FortiGates have the ability to send alerts to Microsoft... Full Story

  • In this post, I am going to walk through... Full Story

  • Troubleshooting VoIP on a FortiGate can feel like trying... Full Story

  • Prior to FortiOS 7.0, there were three commands to... Full Story

  • In this post, I am going to go over... Full Story

  • What we are going to do:  We are going... Full Story

  • Choosing between FGCP (FortiGate Clustering Protocol) and FGSP (FortiGate... Full Story

  • Creating a VLAN on macOS (The "Pro" Move) A... Full Story

  • This blog post explores the logic behind how macOS... Full Story

  • Pretty Fly for a Wi-Fi Tell My Wi-Fi Love... Full Story

  • Part of my daily gig is creating BoMs (Bill-of-Materials)... Full Story

  • ICMP introduces several security risks, but careful filtering, rate... Full Story

  • The command diag debug application dhcps -1 enables full... Full Story

  • In the world of FortiOS, execute tac report is... Full Story

  • LLDP; What is it The Link Layer Discovery Protocol... Full Story

  • What it actually does When you run diagnose fdsm... Full Story

  • Monkey Bites are bite-sized, high-impact security insights designed for... Full Story

  • I have run macOS in macOS with Parallels but... Full Story

  • Don't be confused with my other FortiNAC posts where... Full Story

  • This is the third session in a multi-part article... Full Story

  • Today I was configuring key-based authentication on a FortiGate... Full Story

  • Netcat, often called the "Swiss Army knife" of networking,... Full Story

  • At its core, IEEE 802.1X is a network layer... Full Story

  • In case you did not see the previous FortiNAC... Full Story

  • This is our 5th session where we are going... Full Story

  • Now that we have Wireshark installed and somewhat configured,... Full Story

  • The Philosophy of Packet Analysis Troubleshooting isn't about looking... Full Story

  • Overview FortiOS 8.0 introduces custom tags as a first-class... Full Story

  • These are two distinct mechanisms on FortiOS, and conflating... Full Story

  • Replacement messages are the pages and text blocks that... Full Story